LDR | | 02049nmm uu200421 4500 |
001 | | 000000333552 |
005 | | 20240805173240 |
008 | | 181129s2018 |||||||||||||||||c||eng d |
020 | |
▼a 9780438168336 |
035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10817174 |
035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)umn:19160 |
040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 248032 |
082 | 0 |
▼a 507 |
100 | 1 |
▼a Shenk, Lynne M. |
245 | 10 |
▼a Student Reasoning Strategies Concerning Periodic Trends. |
260 | |
▼a [S.l.] :
▼b University of Minnesota.,
▼c 2018 |
260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor :
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2018 |
300 | |
▼a 212 p. |
500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A. |
500 | |
▼a Adviser: Gillian H. Roehrig. |
502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2018. |
520 | |
▼a The periodic table is recognized as one of the most powerful tools in science. While it is included in virtually all high school and undergraduate general chemistry curricula, it remains a mystery to many chemistry students who find it impossibl |
520 | |
▼a This study investigated student reasoning strategies used to explain periodic trends in atomic and ionic radius, ionization energy, electronegativity, and reactivity. A theoretical framework of scientific reasoning, as it applied to qualitative |
520 | |
▼a The findings suggested that student understanding in the domain of electrostatic forces had the greatest influence on the type of reasoning strategies used. Those students with adequate understanding of electrostatic forces had more resources wi |
590 | |
▼a School code: 0130. |
650 | 4 |
▼a Science education. |
650 | 4 |
▼a Chemistry. |
690 | |
▼a 0714 |
690 | |
▼a 0485 |
710 | 20 |
▼a University of Minnesota.
▼b Education, Curriculum and Instruction. |
773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertation Abstracts International
▼g 79-12A(E). |
773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
790 | |
▼a 0130 |
791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
792 | |
▼a 2018 |
793 | |
▼a English |
856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14998337
▼n KERIS |
980 | |
▼a 201812
▼f 2019 |
990 | |
▼a 관리자 |