LDR | | 00000nmm u2200205 4500 |
001 | | 000000330797 |
005 | | 20241104170957 |
008 | | 181129s2018 ||| | | | eng d |
020 | |
▼a 9780438125674 |
035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10902961 |
035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham:001251 |
040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 248032 |
049 | 1 |
▼f DP |
082 | 0 |
▼a 621 |
100 | 1 |
▼a Yesilevskiy, Yevgeniy. |
245 | 10 |
▼a Understanding and Improving Locomotion: The Simultaneous Optimization of Motion and Morphology in Legged Robots. |
260 | |
▼a [S.l.] :
▼b University of Michigan.,
▼c 2018 |
260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor :
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2018 |
300 | |
▼a 145 p. |
500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: B. |
500 | |
▼a Adviser: C. David Remy. |
502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2018. |
520 | |
▼a There exist many open design questions in the field of legged robotics. Should leg extension and retraction occur with a knee or a prismatic joint? Will adding a compliant ankle lead to improved energetics compared to a point foot? Should quadru |
520 | |
▼a I developed and implemented that methodology to explore three primary robotic design questions. In the first, I asked if parallel or series elastic actuation is the more energetically economical choice for a legged robot. Looking at a variety of |
520 | |
▼a The combination of the above studies readily presents a methodology for simultaneously optimizing for motion and morphology in legged robots. Aside from giving insight into these specific design questions, the technique can also be extended to a |
590 | |
▼a School code: 0127. |
650 | 4 |
▼a Mechanical engineering. |
690 | |
▼a 0548 |
710 | 20 |
▼a University of Michigan.
▼b Mechanical Engineering. |
773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertation Abstracts International
▼g 79-12B(E). |
773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
790 | |
▼a 0127 |
791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
792 | |
▼a 2018 |
793 | |
▼a English |
856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15000469
▼n KERIS |
980 | |
▼a 201812
▼f 2019 |
990 | |
▼a 관리자
▼b 관리자 |