MARC보기
LDR02072nmm uu200397 4500
001000000330309
00520240805161221
008181129s2018 |||||||||||||||||c||eng d
020 ▼a 9780438281844
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10843140
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)asu:18144
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 248032
0820 ▼a 364
1001 ▼a Ginsburg Kempany, Katherine.
24510 ▼a Sanctioning and Punishment in Prisons: An Examination of the Institutional Disciplinary Response to Formal Inmate Misconduct.
260 ▼a [S.l.] : ▼b Arizona State University., ▼c 2018
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor : ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2018
300 ▼a 244 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
500 ▼a Adviser: John R. Hepburn.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
520 ▼a Inmate misconduct, and the formal disciplinary proceeding that follow official misconduct, is a common occurrence within correctional institutions. Decisions regarding punishment sanction post-disciplinary proceeding are important because they h
520 ▼a Addressing this gap in the literature, this study provides the first rigorous empirical examination of the inmate-level characteristics that influence punishment outcome following guilty institutional misconduct proceedings. Guided by criminal s
520 ▼a Results of the fully-saturated direct effects models reveal a consistent pattern across both operationalizations of the punishment outcome. The legal factor of misconduct offense and the prosocial behavior quasi-legal factors of working a prison
590 ▼a School code: 0010.
650 4 ▼a Criminology.
690 ▼a 0627
71020 ▼a Arizona State University. ▼b Criminology and Criminal Justice.
7730 ▼t Dissertation Abstracts International ▼g 79-12A(E).
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0010
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2018
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14999901 ▼n KERIS
980 ▼a 201812 ▼f 2019
990 ▼a 관리자