MARC보기
LDR03229cmm u2200457Mu 4500
001000000327849
003OCoLC
00520240307140719
006m d
007cr cnu||||||||
008230729s2024 dcu o ||| 0 eng d
019 ▼a 1391675228 ▼a 1398134174
020 ▼a 9780309703079
020 ▼a 0309703077
020 ▼a 9780309703093 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 0309703093 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 0309703069
020 ▼z 9780309703062
035 ▼a 3661350 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1391443209 ▼z (OCoLC)1391675228 ▼z (OCoLC)1398134174
040 ▼a EBLCP ▼b eng ▼c EBLCP ▼d YDX ▼d OCLCQ ▼d SMC ▼d N$T ▼d 248032
049 ▼a MAIN
050 4 ▼a TX359
08204 ▼a 363.8 ▼2 23/eng/20231205
1102 ▼a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.), ▼e author.
24510 ▼a Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes ▼h [electronic resource] : ▼b A Letter Report.
260 ▼a Washington, D.C. : ▼b National Academies Press, ▼c 2024.
300 ▼a 1 online resource (47 p.)
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
500 ▼a Description based upon print version of record.
5050 ▼a Intro -- FrontMatter -- Reviewers -- Contents -- Summary -- 1 Letter to the Sponsor -- 2 Charge to the Committee -- 3 Use of New or Existing Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes -- 4 Decision Tree to Determine the Need for a De Novo or Update of an Existing Systematic Review -- 5 Assessment of a Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Carbohydrates -- Appendix A: References -- Appendix B: Committee Member Biographies -- Appendix C: Acronyms and Abbreviations
520 ▼a In response to a request from the US Department of Agriculture, the Health and Medicine Division (HMD) of the National Academies established the Standing Committee to Review the Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) Framework. The committee was asked to respond to DRI-related questions to inform the Federal DRI working group about the conduct of new DRI reviews and DRI-related issues more broadly, including their application. This second letter report advises the Federal DRI Working Group on three questions: 1) Are de novo systematic reviews are needed in future DRI reviews or can qualified systematic reviews be used? 2) If qualified systematic reviews can be used, what are the appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria? 3) Can previously published systematic review be updated? In response, the standing committee developed a report that includes a decision tree that addresses the need for systematic reviews to support the DRI process.
590 ▼a WorldCat record variable field(s) change: 050, 082, 650
650 0 ▼a Nutrition policy.
650 0 ▼a Nutrition ▼x Requirements.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine ▼t Using Systematic Reviews to Support Future Dietary Reference Intakes ▼d Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press,c2024 ▼z 9780309703062
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=3661350
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 3661350
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T