MARC보기
LDR05546cmm u22005778i 4500
001000000321689
003OCoLC
00520230613111423
006m d u
007cr |||||||||||
008200729s2021 cau ob 001 0 eng
010 ▼a 2020034441
020 ▼a 150361428X
020 ▼a 9781503614284 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9781503613669 ▼q (cloth)
035 ▼a 2749678 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1191456249
040 ▼a DLC ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼c DLC ▼d OCLCO ▼d OCLCF ▼d YDX ▼d N$T ▼d 248032
042 ▼a pcc
049 ▼a MAIN
05000 ▼a JZ4034
08200 ▼a 320.15 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Ciorciari, John D. ▼q (John David), ▼e author.
24510 ▼a Sovereignty sharing in fragile states / ▼c John D. Ciorciari. ▼h [electronic resource]
260 ▼a Stanford, California : ▼b Stanford University Press, ▼c 2021.
263 ▼a 2103
300 ▼a 1 online resource
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b n ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b nc ▼2 rdacarrier
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
5050 ▼a Justifying shared sovereignty -- How political foundations affect performance -- Partnering to prosecute war crimes -- Compromising on hybrid justice -- Imposing a mixed tribunal -- Sharing sovereignty in the streets -- Contracting for criminal investigation -- Co-signing to curb corruption -- The path ahead.
520 ▼a "This book addresses a prime challenge facing the international community: how to address governance gaps in fragile states. When governments fail to provide law and order and other basic public services, their citizens suffer, and threats to international security can emerge. Ordinary foreign aid programs are often insufficient remedies. A remarkable alternative therefore has arisen in which international and national actors share authority to carry out core sovereign tasks. This type of "sovereignty sharing" is controversial and challenging but is an important way in which the United Nations and other key global actors have sought to bolster governance in troubled polities. I examine sovereignty-sharing arrangements designed to repair ruptures in the rule of law-the heart of a well-governed state. I discuss both the conditions under which sovereignty may be justified and the conditions under which joint ventures are likely to be effective in meeting their aims. A central argument in the book is that these two questions are closely related, because the perceived legitimacy of a sovereignty-sharing venture hinges primarily on its performance. Sovereignty sharing carries important positive potential as a way to provide stopgap governance services and to help strengthen and reform ailing local institutions. It can pair international resources and expertise with local knowledge and ownership. Thriving partnerships can deliver better public services, earn popular legitimacy, and foster capacity building and domestic institutional reform. However, the dangers of sovereignty-sharing arrangements are equally apparent. This book illuminates the political factors that shape the creation, design, and implementation of sovereignty-sharing arrangements-and thus their performance and perceived legitimacy--above all on how the convergence or divergence of national and international interests shape these exceptional ventures. Sovereignty sharing is usually based on precarious political foundations, as the partners seldom share a common vision for governance. To accommodate differences, sovereignty-sharing arrangements are usually rooted in ambiguous agreements that contribute to confusion and discord during implementation. In particular, the partners' interests tend to diverge on matters of domestic institutional reform. As a result, while sovereignty-sharing schemes often have made important contributions through stopgap service provision, their record is much weaker on embedding reform. This book illustrates these arguments by examining sovereignty-sharing arrangements in three key domains: hybrid criminal tribunals, joint policing arrangements, and anti-corruption initiatives. Within each area, I touch on the universe of relevant cases and discuss the most important ventures in depth. These include cases from Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Lebanon, Timor-Leste, Guatemala, and Liberia. The diversity of these case studies helps to show the broad relevance of the book's arguments"-- ▼c Provided by publisher.
588 ▼a Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
590 ▼a Added to collection customer.56279.3
650 0 ▼a Sovereignty.
650 0 ▼a Rule of law.
650 0 ▼a Legitimacy of governments.
650 0 ▼a Political stability.
650 0 ▼a International cooperation.
650 7 ▼a International cooperation ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00976857
650 7 ▼a Legitimacy of governments ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00995908
650 7 ▼a Political stability ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01069883
650 7 ▼a Rule of law ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01101218
650 7 ▼a Sovereignty ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01127379
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Ciorciari, John D. (John David). ▼t Sovereignty sharing in fragile states ▼d Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, 2021. ▼z 9781503613669 ▼w (DLC) 2020034440
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2749678
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 301929080
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 2749678
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T