MARC보기
LDR04045cmm u2200577 i 4500
001000000321313
003OCoLC
00520230613110534
006m d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008191024s2020 nyu ob 001 0 eng
010 ▼a 2019043021
020 ▼a 9780190648794 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0190648791 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0190648805 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 9780190648817 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0190648813 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 9780190648800 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9780190648787 ▼q hardcover
035 ▼a 2398791 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1125279945
040 ▼a DLC ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼e pn ▼c DLC ▼d OCLCO ▼d OCLCF ▼d YDX ▼d EBLCP ▼d OCLCQ ▼d UKOUP ▼d YDX ▼d N$T ▼d 248032
042 ▼a pcc
049 ▼a MAIN
05004 ▼a HF5549.5.A34 ▼b L57 2020
08200 ▼a 331.2/153 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, ▼d 1964-, ▼e author.
24510 ▼a Making sense of affirmative action / ▼c Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. ▼h [electronic resource]
260 ▼a New York, NY : ▼b Oxford University Press, ▼c [2020]
300 ▼a 1 online resource (xi, 276 pages)
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 ▼a "What makes affirmative action morally (un)justified? That is this book's core question. Its main contribution consists in a meticulous scrutiny of the strength of the six main arguments for-i.e., the compensation, the anti-discrimination, the equality of opportunity, the role model, the diversity, and the integration-based justifications-and the five main objections to affirmative action-i.e., the reverse discrimination, the stigma, the mismatch, the publicity, and the merit-based objections-and of how these arguments relate to one another. The book argues that all of the five main objections to affirmative action are either flawed or quite limited in terms of their implications. With regard to the arguments in favor of affirmative action, the book shows why the anti-discrimination and equality of opportunity-based arguments provide strong justifications for many affirmative action schemes. In light thereof and the fact that the five most influential arguments against affirmative action are all flawed or otherwise weak, the overall claim defended in the book is that many of the schemes that people have in mind when they discuss affirmative action (many of which are presently on the retreat) are justified. However, the book also emphasizes that any definitive answer to the question Is affirmative action morally (un)justified? must rest on a wide range of empirical results in the social sciences etc., e.g., about the likely effects of various affirmative action schemes; and that the question, when posed in such general form (unlike when it is asked about specific schemes of affirmative action), admits of no direct positive or negative answer"-- ▼c Provided by publisher.
588 ▼a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on May 07, 2020).
590 ▼a Added to collection customer.56279.3
650 0 ▼a Affirmative action programs.
650 0 ▼a Discrimination in employment.
650 0 ▼a Equality.
650 7 ▼a Affirmative action programs. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00798899
650 7 ▼a Discrimination in employment. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00895050
650 7 ▼a Equality. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00914456
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, 1964- ▼t Making sense of affirmative action. ▼d New York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2020] ▼z 9780190648787 ▼w (DLC) 2019043020
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2398791
938 ▼a Oxford University Press USA ▼b OUPR ▼n EDZ0002205409
938 ▼a ProQuest Ebook Central ▼b EBLB ▼n EBL6141282
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 16707021
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 2398791
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T