MARC보기
LDR04228cmm u2200673Ki 4500
001000000320986
003OCoLC
00520230613105807
006m d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008190115s2019 mau ob 001 0 eng d
020 ▼a 9780674240193 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 0674240197 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9780674368255
020 ▼z 0674368258
035 ▼a 1980389 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1082259854
037 ▼a 22573/ctvcjjncj ▼b JSTOR
040 ▼a N$T ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼e pn ▼c N$T ▼d EBLCP ▼d YDX ▼d JSTOR ▼d 248032
049 ▼a MAIN
050 4 ▼a K247.6 ▼b .O85 2019eb
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 101000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 044000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 052000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 071000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 098000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 079000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a LAW ▼x 075000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a PHI ▼x 005000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a POL ▼x 029000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a SOC ▼x 026040 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 340/.112 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Osiel, Mark, ▼e author.
24514 ▼a The right to do wrong : ▼b morality and the limits of law / ▼c Mark Osiel. ▼h [electronic resource]
260 ▼a Cambridge, Massachusetts : ▼b Harvard University Press, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 1 online resource.
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
5050 ▼a Common morality, social mores, and the law -- A sampling of rights to do wrong -- Three rights to do serious wrong -- How to "abuse" a right -- Law and morality in ordinary language and social science -- Divergences of law and morals: sites and sources -- Convergences of law and morals: sites and sources -- Questions of method and meaning -- Why this book is not what you had in mind -- The changing stance of lawyers towards common morality -- Commercial morality, bourgeois virtue, and the law -- How we attach responsibilities to rights -- Common morality confronts modernity.
520 ▼a The law sometimes permits what ordinary morality, or widely-shared notions of right and wrong, reproaches. Rights to Do Grave Wrong explores the relationship between law and common morality to clarify law's reliance on society's broad presumption that people will exercise their rights responsibly. More concretely, he argues that certain legal rights rest on tacit sociological assumptions as to who will exercise them, under what circumstances, and how frequently. Further, he argues that we depend on stigma and shame to reduce and circumscribe the law's use. Some examples: though reneging on a debt is considered wrong, the law allows you to declare personal bankruptcy; international law allows museums to retain some masterworks looted from their rightful owners; in many countries abortion is permitted as a means of birth control. Using these examples and more, Osiel presents a "social scientific" analysis of law's interaction with social mores and the extent to which they limit our exercising rights to do wrong. The paradox he intends to elucidate is when and why it is appropriate for societies to champion de jure entitlements even as they successfully limit their de facto usage.-- ▼c Provided by publisher.
5880 ▼a Print version record.
590 ▼a Master record variable field(s) change: 072
650 0 ▼a Law and ethics.
650 7 ▼a Law and ethics. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00993904
650 7 ▼a LAW / Essays ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a LAW / General Practice ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a LAW / Jurisprudence ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a LAW / Paralegals & Paralegalism ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a LAW / Practical Guides ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a LAW / Reference ▼2 bisacsh
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Osiel, Mark. ▼t Right to do wrong. ▼d Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019 ▼z 9780674368255 ▼w (DLC) 2018025427 ▼w (OCoLC)1041249832
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1980389
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 15976469
938 ▼a EBL - Ebook Library ▼b EBLB ▼n EBL5632457
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 1980389
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T