MARC보기
LDR03718cmm u2200505Ki 4500
001000000317575
003OCoLC
00520230525182913
006m d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008191211s2020 mau o 000 0 eng d
019 ▼a 1139764468
020 ▼a 9780262356596 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0262356597 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼z 9780262043397
020 ▼z 0262043394
035 ▼a 2367741 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1130311088 ▼z (OCoLC)1139764468
037 ▼a 11182 ▼b MIT Press
037 ▼a 9780262356596 ▼b MIT Press
040 ▼a MITPR ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼e pn ▼c MITPR ▼d OCLCF ▼d YDX ▼d N$T ▼d YDXIT ▼d 248032
049 ▼a MAIN
050 4 ▼a QH360.5 ▼b .P68 2020
08204 ▼a 576.8 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Powell, Russell, ▼e author.
24510 ▼a Contingency and convergence : ▼b toward a cosmic biology of body and mind / ▼c Russell Powell.
260 ▼a Cambridge, Massachusetts : ▼b The MIT Press, ▼c [2020]
300 ▼a 1 online resource.
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
4901 ▼a Vienna series in theoretical biology
520 ▼a Can we can use the patterns and processes of convergent evolution to make inferences about universal laws of life, on Earth and elsewhere In this book, Russell Powell investigates whether we can use the patterns and processes of convergent evolution to make inferences about universal laws of life, on Earth and elsewhere. Weaving together disparate philosophical and empirical threads, Powell offers the first detailed analysis of the interplay between contingency and convergence in macroevolution, as it relates to both complex life in general and cognitively complex life in particular. If the evolution of mind is not a historical accident, the product of convergence rather than contingency, then, Powell asks, is mind likely to be an evolutionarily important feature of any living world Stephen Jay Gould argued for the primacy of contingency in evolution. Gould's "radical contingency thesis" (RCT) has been challenged, but critics have largely failed to engage with its core claims and theoretical commitments. Powell fills this gap. He first examines convergent regularities at both temporal and phylogenetic depths, finding evidence that both vindicates and rebuffs Gould's argument for contingency. Powell follows this partial defense of the RCT with a substantive critique. Among the evolutionary outcomes that might defy the RCT, he argues, cognition is particularly important--not only for human-specific issues of the evolution of intelligence and consciousness but also for the large-scale ecological organization of macroscopic living worlds. Turning his attention to complex cognitive life, Powell considers what patterns of cognitive convergence tell us about the nature of mind, its evolution, and its place in the universe. If complex bodies are common in the universe, might complex minds be common as well.
588 ▼a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on February 24, 2020).
590 ▼a Master record variable field(s) change: 050
650 0 ▼a Evolution (Biology) ▼x Philosophy.
650 0 ▼a Convergence (Biology) ▼x Philosophy.
650 7 ▼a Evolution (Biology) ▼x Philosophy. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00917312
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼z 0262043394 ▼z 9780262043397 ▼w (OCoLC)1119763590
830 0 ▼a Vienna series in theoretical biology.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2367741
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 301094165
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 2367741
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T