MARC보기
LDR04110cmm u2200673Ia 4500
001000000313932
003OCoLC
00520230525163521
006m d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008130530s2013 enk ob 001 0 eng d
020 ▼a 9780521191616 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 0521191610 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 9781107055162 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 1107055164 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9780521191616
020 ▼z 0521191610
035 ▼a (OCoLC)845068949
035 ▼a 569176 ▼b (N$T)
040 ▼a N$T ▼c N$T ▼d 248032
049 ▼a N$TA
050 4 ▼a Z711.92.H3 ▼b V37 2013eb
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 013000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 014000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 018000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 067000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 032000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 037000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a COM ▼x 052000 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 004.087 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Varney, Eliza, ▼d 1978-, ▼e author.
24510 ▼a Disability and information technology ▼h [electronic resource] : ▼b a comparative study in media regulation / ▼c Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University.
260 ▼a Cambridge : ▼b Cambridge University Press, ▼c 2013.
300 ▼a 1 online resource (xxiii, 288 p.)
4901 ▼a Cambridge disability law and policy series
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.
5058 ▼a Machine generated contents note: 1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights; 2. Case study: Canada; 3. Case study: the European Union; 4. Case study: the United Kingdom; 5. Case study: the United States of America; 6. Lessons to be learnt? Reflection on the case studies.
520 ▼a "Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities"-- ▼c Provided by publisher.
588 ▼a Description based on print version record.
650 0 ▼a People with disabilities ▼x Information techology ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a People with disabilities ▼x Services for ▼x Data processing ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Computers and people with disabilities ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a People with disabilities ▼x Legal status, laws, etc. ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Mass media ▼x Law and legislation ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Libraries and people with disabilities ▼v Case studies.
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Computer Literacy ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Computer Science ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Data Processing ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Hardware / General ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Information Technology ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Machine Theory ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a COMPUTERS / Reference ▼2 bisacsh
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Varney, Eliza, 1978- author. ▼t Disability and information technology. ▼d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2013 ▼z 9780521191616 ▼w (DLC) 2012040416 ▼w (OCoLC)815757580
830 0 ▼a Cambridge disability law and policy series.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=569176
910 ▼a cpp2010
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 569176
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 02 ▼b N$T