MARC보기
LDR06019cmm uu200601Mu 4500
001000000304859
00520230525095425
006m o d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008140426s2014 xx o 000 0 eng d
020 ▼a 9789027270467 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 9027270465 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9027270465
035 ▼a (OCoLC)878263185
040 ▼a EBLCP ▼b eng ▼c EBLCP ▼d N$T ▼d OCLCO ▼d E7B ▼d YDXCP ▼d OCLCO ▼d 248032
049 ▼a K4RA
050 4 ▼a P298
072 7 ▼a FOR ▼x 009000 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 430.045 ▼a 430/.045
1001 ▼a Bech, Kristin.
24510 ▼a Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages ▼h [electronic resource].
260 ▼a Amsterdam/Philadelphia : ▼b John Benjamins Publishing Company, ▼c 2014.
300 ▼a 1 online resource (429 p.)
4901 ▼a Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today ; ▼v v.213
500 ▼a Description based upon print version of record.
500 ▼a 2. The distribution of full and reduced definite articles in Present-day German: Some theoretical concepts
5050 ▼a Information Structure and Syntactic Changein Germanic and Romance Languages; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; PartI. Information-structural categories and corpus annotation; Part II.Changes on the interface between syntax and information structure; Part III.Comparisons on the interface between syntax and information structure; Acknowledgements; Information structure and syntax in oldGermanic and Romance languages; 1. Introduction; 2. Approaches to information structure and syntax in historical linguistics; 3. Annotated corpora; 4. The structure of the book; References
5058 ▼a The theoretical foundations of givenness annotation1. Introduction; 1.1 Theory and practice; 2. Theory; 2.1 Discourse referents; 2.2 Taggables; 2.3 Reference contexts; 2.4 Contexts and reference resolution in dynamic semantics; 2.4.1 The discourse context; 2.4.2 The encyclopaedic context and the situation context; 2.4.3 The scenario context; 2.4.4 Embedded contexts and non-specificity; 2.5 Generic reference; 2.6 The PROIEL tagset; 3. Annotation in practice; 3.1 General; 3.2 Specificity -- nonspec vs. new; 3.3 Genericity; 3.3.1 kind vs. nonspec; 3.3.2 kind vs. acc-gen; 3.4 Bridging
5058 ▼a 3.4.1 acc-inf vs old3.4.2 acc-inf vs new, nonspec or no tag -- the limits to inference; 4. Evaluation and conclusions; 4.1 The PROIEL scheme and other givenness annotation schemes; 4.2 Annotation workflow and interannotator agreement; 4.3 Data sample; 4.4 Conclusions; References; Testing the theory; 1. Introduction; 2. The data; 3. 'Old/given' information; 4. Inferables; 5. 'New' information; 6. Conclusions; Appendix A: Notes on data collection; References; Quantifying information structure changein English; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Old English V2 syntax and the subject
5058 ▼a 1.2 The changing role of the English subject1.3 Hypotheses; 2. Corpora; 2.1 Referential status; 2.2 Enriched texts; 3. Experiments; 3.1 Subject ellipsis; 3.2 Subject referent switch; 3.2.1 A definition of subject-referent switch; 3.2.2 Measuring subject-referent switch; 3.2.3 Subject-referent switch results; 3.2.4 Subject chain distribution; 3.3 Subject animacy; 3.3.1 Determining subject animacy; 3.3.2 Subject animacy results; 3.4 Pre-subject linking; 3.4.1 Clause-initial linking; 3.4.2 Determining pre-subject linking; 3.4.3 Pre-subject linking results; 4. Conclusions and discussion
5058 ▼a 5. SourcesReferences; Tracing overlap in function in historical corpora; 1. Introduction; 2. The passive and object fronting as 'information-rearrangers'; 3. Comparing the function of passives and object fronting in Old English; 3.1 Information status categories; 3.2 Results for long passives; 3.3 Results for object fronting; 4. The frequency of topicalization and passivization in the history of English; 5. Conclusion; References; Referential properties of the full and reduced forms of the definite article in German; 1. Introduction
520 ▼a In this article, we discuss how contrastivity can be identified in historical texts where we have no direct access to prosodic features such as stress and intonation. We depart from our knowledge of contrastivity in the modern languages and their exponence in Modern Spanish and Portuguese, where both word order and prosody play a role in expressing contrast, and compare the analysis of the modern languages to our data of Old Spanish and Old Portuguese. Our findings indicate that very little has changed with regard to the expression of contrastivity through word order. Therefore, any word order.
650 4 ▼a Germanic languages -- Grammar, Comparative -- Romance.
650 4 ▼a Grammar, Comparative and general -- Syntax.
650 4 ▼a Grammar, Comparative and general -- Topic and content.
650 4 ▼a Romance languages -- Grammar, Comparative -- Germanic.
650 4 ▼a Romance languages --Grammar, Comparative -- Germanic.
650 0 ▼a Grammar, Comparative and general ▼x Topic and content.
650 0 ▼a Grammar, Comparative and general ▼x Syntax.
650 0 ▼a Germanic languages ▼x Grammar, Comparative ▼x Romance.
650 0 ▼a Romance languages ▼x Grammar, Comparative ▼x Germanic.
650 0 ▼a Language and languages ▼x Variation.
650 0 ▼a Comparative linguistics.
650 7 ▼a FOREIGN LANGUAGE STUDY / German. ▼2 bisacsh
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
7001 ▼a Eide, Kristine Gunn.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Bech, Kristin ▼t Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages ▼d Amsterdam/Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company,c2014 ▼z 9789027255969
830 0 ▼a Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=761346
938 ▼a EBL - Ebook Library ▼b EBLB ▼n EBL1676585
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 761346
938 ▼a ebrary ▼b EBRY ▼n ebr10861906
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 11780619
990 ▼a 관리자