LDR | | 03427cmm uu200613Mi 4500 |
001 | | 000000304429 |
005 | | 20230519175503 |
006 | | m o d |
007 | | cr |n||||||||| |
008 | | 140927s2012 xx o 000 0 eng d |
019 | |
▼a 892047017
▼a 893685683 |
020 | |
▼a 9780810885752 |
020 | |
▼a 0810885751 |
020 | |
▼z 9780810885745 |
020 | |
▼a 1322159181 (ebk) |
020 | |
▼a 9781322159188 (ebk) |
035 | |
▼a (OCoLC)891447945
▼z (OCoLC)892047017
▼z (OCoLC)893685683 |
037 | |
▼a 647175
▼b MIL |
040 | |
▼a EBLCP
▼b eng
▼e pn
▼c EBLCP
▼d OCLCQ
▼d E7B
▼d N$T
▼d OCLCF
▼d IDEBK
▼d YDXCP
▼d OCLCO
▼d DEBSZ
▼d OCLCO
▼d 248032 |
049 | |
▼a K4RA |
050 | 4 |
▼a LB2333 .G58 2013 |
072 | 7 |
▼a EDU
▼x 015000
▼2 bisacsh |
082 | 04 |
▼a 378.1/2
▼a 378.12 |
100 | 1 |
▼a Gould, Thomas H. P. |
245 | 10 |
▼a Do We Still Need Peer Review?
▼h [electronic resource] :
▼b an Argument for Change. |
260 | |
▼a Lanham :
▼b Scarecrow Press,
▼c 2012. |
300 | |
▼a 1 online resource (185 pages) |
336 | |
▼a text
▼b txt
▼2 rdacontent |
337 | |
▼a computer
▼b c
▼2 rdamedia |
338 | |
▼a online resource
▼b cr
▼2 rdacarrier |
504 | |
▼a Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. |
505 | 0 |
▼a Do We Still Need Peer Review?; Contents; Acknowledgments; Preface; 1 What Is Peer Review and Why Do We Need It?; 2 Early Peer Review; 3 Peer Review, 1600-1950; 4 Anonymous, Double-Blind Peer Review; 5 The Rise of the Internet, the Supremacy of the Individual; 6 Recent Suggested Solutions; 7 Option One: Eliminate Peer Review (Partially and Totally); 8 Can We Review Ourselves?; 9 Private Industry and Academic Associations Solve It All (But Are Tenure Committees Left Holding the Bag?); 10 The Future of Peer Review: What Have We Lost and What Can We Gain?; Index; About the Author. |
520 | |
▼a <Span><span><span>The current peer review process is broken and unless changes are made it will soon die. </span><span style=""font-style:italic;"">Do We Still Need Peer Review?</span><span> examines the evolution of peer review from the earliest attempts by the Church to evaluate scholarly works to the creation of academic peer review and finally to the current status of the process. Gould argues that without an immediate effort by scholars to institute reform, the future of peer review may cease to exist.</span></span></span> |
588 | 0 |
▼a Print version record. |
650 | 4 |
▼a College teachers
▼x Rating of. |
650 | 4 |
▼a Peer review. |
650 | 4 |
▼a Scholarly publishing. |
650 | 0 |
▼a College teachers
▼x Rating of. |
650 | 0 |
▼a Peer review. |
650 | 0 |
▼a Scholarly publishing. |
650 | 7 |
▼a EDUCATION / Higher.
▼2 bisacsh |
650 | 7 |
▼a College teachers
▼x Rating of.
▼2 fast
▼0 (OCoLC)fst00868154 |
650 | 7 |
▼a Peer review.
▼2 fast
▼0 (OCoLC)fst01056591 |
650 | 7 |
▼a Scholarly publishing.
▼2 fast
▼0 (OCoLC)fst01106866 |
655 | 4 |
▼a Electronic books. |
655 | 7 |
▼a Electronic books.
▼2 local |
655 | 0 |
▼a Electronic books. |
776 | 08 |
▼i Print version:
▼a Gould, Thomas H.P.
▼t Do We Still Need Peer Review? : An Argument for Change.
▼d Lanham : Scarecrow Press, 짤2012
▼z 9780810885745 |
856 | 40 |
▼3 EBSCOhost
▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=852152 |
938 | |
▼a EBL - Ebook Library
▼b EBLB
▼n EBL1791717 |
938 | |
▼a ebrary
▼b EBRY
▼n ebr10938176 |
938 | |
▼a EBSCOhost
▼b EBSC
▼n 852152 |
938 | |
▼a Ingram Digital eBook Collection
▼b IDEB
▼n cis29835521 |
938 | |
▼a YBP Library Services
▼b YANK
▼n 9668186 |
990 | |
▼a 관리자 |