MARC보기
LDR03427cmm uu200613Mi 4500
001000000304429
00520230519175503
006m o d
007cr |n|||||||||
008140927s2012 xx o 000 0 eng d
019 ▼a 892047017 ▼a 893685683
020 ▼a 9780810885752
020 ▼a 0810885751
020 ▼z 9780810885745
020 ▼a 1322159181 (ebk)
020 ▼a 9781322159188 (ebk)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)891447945 ▼z (OCoLC)892047017 ▼z (OCoLC)893685683
037 ▼a 647175 ▼b MIL
040 ▼a EBLCP ▼b eng ▼e pn ▼c EBLCP ▼d OCLCQ ▼d E7B ▼d N$T ▼d OCLCF ▼d IDEBK ▼d YDXCP ▼d OCLCO ▼d DEBSZ ▼d OCLCO ▼d 248032
049 ▼a K4RA
050 4 ▼a LB2333 .G58 2013
072 7 ▼a EDU ▼x 015000 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 378.1/2 ▼a 378.12
1001 ▼a Gould, Thomas H. P.
24510 ▼a Do We Still Need Peer Review? ▼h [electronic resource] : ▼b an Argument for Change.
260 ▼a Lanham : ▼b Scarecrow Press, ▼c 2012.
300 ▼a 1 online resource (185 pages)
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
5050 ▼a Do We Still Need Peer Review?; Contents; Acknowledgments; Preface; 1 What Is Peer Review and Why Do We Need It?; 2 Early Peer Review; 3 Peer Review, 1600-1950; 4 Anonymous, Double-Blind Peer Review; 5 The Rise of the Internet, the Supremacy of the Individual; 6 Recent Suggested Solutions; 7 Option One: Eliminate Peer Review (Partially and Totally); 8 Can We Review Ourselves?; 9 Private Industry and Academic Associations Solve It All (But Are Tenure Committees Left Holding the Bag?); 10 The Future of Peer Review: What Have We Lost and What Can We Gain?; Index; About the Author.
520 ▼a <Span><span><span>The current peer review process is broken and unless changes are made it will soon die. </span><span style=""font-style:italic;"">Do We Still Need Peer Review?</span><span> examines the evolution of peer review from the earliest attempts by the Church to evaluate scholarly works to the creation of academic peer review and finally to the current status of the process. Gould argues that without an immediate effort by scholars to institute reform, the future of peer review may cease to exist.</span></span></span>
5880 ▼a Print version record.
650 4 ▼a College teachers ▼x Rating of.
650 4 ▼a Peer review.
650 4 ▼a Scholarly publishing.
650 0 ▼a College teachers ▼x Rating of.
650 0 ▼a Peer review.
650 0 ▼a Scholarly publishing.
650 7 ▼a EDUCATION / Higher. ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a College teachers ▼x Rating of. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00868154
650 7 ▼a Peer review. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01056591
650 7 ▼a Scholarly publishing. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01106866
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
655 7 ▼a Electronic books. ▼2 local
655 0 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Gould, Thomas H.P. ▼t Do We Still Need Peer Review? : An Argument for Change. ▼d Lanham : Scarecrow Press, 짤2012 ▼z 9780810885745
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=852152
938 ▼a EBL - Ebook Library ▼b EBLB ▼n EBL1791717
938 ▼a ebrary ▼b EBRY ▼n ebr10938176
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 852152
938 ▼a Ingram Digital eBook Collection ▼b IDEB ▼n cis29835521
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 9668186
990 ▼a 관리자