MARC보기
LDR03587cmm u2200517Mi 4500
001000000321289
003OCoLC
00520230613110500
006m d
007cr |||||||||||
008200915t20201995nju fod z000 0 eng d
010 ▼a 2020936093
020 ▼a 0691210543
020 ▼a 9780691210544 ▼q (electronic bk.)
0247 ▼a 10.1515/9780691210544 ▼2 doi
035 ▼a 2382471 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1198932022
040 ▼a DEGRU ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼c DEGRU ▼d OCLCO ▼d OCLCF ▼d N$T ▼d 248032
044 ▼a nju ▼c US-NJ
049 ▼a MAIN
050 4 ▼a Q175.5 ▼b .P67 2020
072 7 ▼a SCI034000 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 306.4/5 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Porter, Theodore M., ▼e author. ▼4 aut ▼4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
24510 ▼a Trust in Numbers : ▼b The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life / ▼c Theodore M. Porter. ▼h [electronic resource]
260 ▼a Princeton, NJ : ▼b Princeton University Press, ▼c [2020]
300 ▼a 1 online resource (344 p.)
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
347 ▼a text file ▼b PDF ▼2 rda
50500 ▼t Frontmatter -- ▼t Contents -- ▼t Preface to the New Edition -- ▼t Preface -- ▼t Acknowledgments -- ▼t INTRODUCTION. Cultures of Objectivity -- ▼t CHAPTER ONE. A World of Artifice -- ▼t CHAPTER TWO. How Social Numbers Are Made Valid -- ▼t CHAPTER THREE. Economic Measurement and the Values of Science -- ▼t CHAPTER FOUR. The Political Philosophy of Quantification -- ▼t CHAPTER FIVE. Experts against Objectivity: Accountants and Actuaries -- ▼t CHAPTER SIX. French State Engineers and the Ambiguities of Technocracy -- ▼t CHAPTER SEVEN. U.S. Army Engineers and the Rise of Cost-Benefit Analysis -- ▼t CHAPTER EIGHT. Objectivity and the Politics of Disciplines -- ▼t CHAPTER NINE. Is Science Made by Communities? -- ▼t Notes -- ▼t Bibliography -- ▼t Index
520 ▼a A foundational work on historical and social studies of quantification What accounts for the prestige of quantitative methods? The usual answer is that quantification is desirable in social investigation as a result of its successes in science. Trust in Numbers questions whether such success in the study of stars, molecules, or cells should be an attractive model for research on human societies, and examines why the natural sciences are highly quantitative in the first place. Theodore Porter argues that a better understanding of the attractions of quantification in business, government, and social research brings a fresh perspective to its role in psychology, physics, and medicine. Quantitative rigor is not inherent in science but arises from political and social pressures, and objectivity derives its impetus from cultural contexts. In a new preface, the author sheds light on the current infatuation with quantitative methods, particularly at the intersection of science and bureaucracy.
546 ▼a In English.
5880 ▼a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 15. Sep 2020).
590 ▼a Added to collection customer.56279.3
650 0 ▼a Objectivity.
650 0 ▼a Science ▼x Social aspects.
650 7 ▼a SCIENCE / History. ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a Objectivity. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01042815
650 7 ▼a Science ▼x Social aspects. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01108360
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2382471
938 ▼a De Gruyter ▼b DEGR ▼n 9780691210544
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 2382471
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T