MARC보기
LDR03668cmm uu200589Ki 4500
001000000303573
00520230519173541
006m o d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008150304s2015 dcu ob 001 0 eng d
020 ▼a 9781626161948 ▼q electronic bk.
020 ▼a 1626161941 ▼q electronic bk.
020 ▼z 9781626161924
020 ▼z 1626161925
020 ▼z 1626161941
020 ▼z 9781626161931
020 ▼z 1626161933
035 ▼a (OCoLC)904339001
040 ▼a N$T ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼e pn ▼c N$T ▼d P@U ▼d EBLCP ▼d N$T ▼d 248032
043 ▼a n-us---
049 ▼a K4RA
050 4 ▼a JZ1305 ▼b .P668 2015eb
072 7 ▼a HIS ▼x 027130 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a TEC ▼x 025000 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 355/.033573 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Porter, Patrick, ▼d 1976, ▼e author.
24514 ▼a The global village myth : ▼b distance, war and the limits of power / ▼c Patrick Porter.
264 1 ▼a Washington, DC : ▼b Georgetown University Press, ▼c 2015.
300 ▼a 1 online resource.
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
5050 ▼a Introduction : strife in the village -- So near, so far : physical and strategic distance -- Wars for the world : the rise of globalism: 1941, 1950, 2001 -- Lost in space : Al Qaeda and the limits of netwar -- Access denied : technology, terrain and the barriers to conquest -- Wide of the mark : drones, cyber and the tyrannies of distance -- Conclusion : the geopolitics of hubris.
520 ▼a Porter challenges the powerful ideology of "Globalism" that is widely subscribed to by the US national security community. Globalism entails visions of a perilous shrunken world in which security interests are interconnected almost without limit, exposing even powerful states to instant war. Globalism does not just describe the world, but prescribes expansive strategies to deal with it, portraying a fragile globe that the superpower must continually tame into order. Porter argues that this vision of the world has resulted in the US undertaking too many unnecessary military adventures and dangerous strategic overstretch. Distance and geography should be some of the factors that help the US separate the important from the unimportant in international relations. The US should also recognize that, despite the latest technologies, projecting power over great distances still incurs frictions and costs that set real limits on American power. Reviving an appreciation of distance and geography would lead to a more sensible and sustainable grand strategy.
5880 ▼a Print version record.
650 0 ▼a International relations.
650 0 ▼a Security, International.
650 7 ▼a Diplomatic relations. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01907412
650 7 ▼a International relations. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00977053
650 7 ▼a Security, International. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01110895
650 7 ▼a HISTORY / Military / Other. ▼2 bisacsh
650 7 ▼a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science. ▼2 bisacsh
651 0 ▼a United States ▼x Foreign relations ▼y 20th century.
651 0 ▼a United States ▼x Foreign relations ▼y 21st century.
651 7 ▼a United States. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Porter, Patrick, 1976- author. ▼t Global village myth ▼z 9781626161924 ▼w (DLC) 2014026896 ▼w (OCoLC)885026309
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=960726
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 960726
938 ▼a Project MUSE ▼b MUSE ▼n muse42477
938 ▼a EBL - Ebook Library ▼b EBLB ▼n EBL1977099
990 ▼a 관리자