MARC보기
LDR04351cmm uu200613Ka 4500
001000000299144
003OCoLC
00520230517132149
006m d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008110131s2010 mau ob 001 0 eng d
019 ▼a 694271077 ▼a 758545227
020 ▼a 9780262289719 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼a 0262289717 (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9780262014472
020 ▼z 0262014475
0248 ▼a 9786612899294
0291 ▼a HEBIS ▼b 278031080
0291 ▼a NZ1 ▼b 13934943
035 ▼a (OCoLC)699490862
037 ▼a 289929 ▼b MIL
040 ▼a N$T ▼b eng ▼c N$T ▼d CDX ▼d E7B ▼d YDXCP ▼d OCLCQ ▼d TUU ▼d OCLCQ ▼d 248032
049 ▼a K4RA
050 4 ▼a AE100 ▼b .R43 2010eb
072 7 ▼a REF ▼x 010000 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 030 ▼2 22
1001 ▼a Reagle, Joseph Michael.
24510 ▼a Good faith collaboration ▼h [electronic resource] : ▼b the culture of Wikipedia / ▼c Joseph Michael Reagle, Jr. ; foreword by Lawrence Lessig.
260 ▼a Cambridge, Mass. : ▼b MIT Press, ▼c c2010.
300 ▼a 1 online resource (xv, 244 p.)
4901 ▼a History and foundations of information science
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
5050 ▼a Nazis and norms -- The pursuit of the universal encyclopedia -- Good faith collaboration -- The puzzle of openness -- The challenges of consensus -- The benevolent dictator -- Encyclopedic anxiety -- Conclusion : a globe in accord.
520 ▼a Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, is built by a community - a community of Wikipedians who are expected to "assume good faith" when interacting with one another. In Good Faith Collaboration, Joseph Reagle examines this unique collaborative culture.
520 ▼a Wikipedia, says Reagle, is not the first effort to create a freely shared, universal encyclopedia; its early twentieth-century ancestors include Paul Otlet's Universal Repository and H.G. Wells's proposal for a World Brain. Both these projects, like Wikipedia, were fuelled by new technology-which at the time included index cards and microfilm. What distinguishes Wikipedia from these and other more recent ventures is Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture, as seen not only in the writing and editing of articles but also in their discussion pages and edit histories. Keeping an open perspective on both knowledge claims and other contributors, Reagle argues, creates an extraordinary collaborative potential.
520 ▼a Wikipedia is famously an encyclopedia "anyone can edit," and Reagle examines Wikipedia's openness and several challenges to it: technical features that limit vandalism to articles; private actions to mitigate potential legal problems; and Wikipedia's own internal bureaucratization. He explores Wikipedia's process of consensus (reviewing a dispute over naming articles on television shows) and examines the way leadership and authority work in an open content community.
520 ▼a Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been imitated, analyzed, and satirized. Despite the social unease over its implications for individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the character (and quality) of cultural products, Wikipedia's good faith collaborative culture has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the century-old pursuit of a universal encyclopedia."--Jacket.
588 ▼a Description based on print version record.
63000 ▼a Wikipedia.
650 0 ▼a Electronic encyclopedias ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Wikis (Computer science) ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Communication in learning and scholarship ▼x Technological innovations ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Authorship ▼x Collaboration ▼v Case studies.
650 0 ▼a Online social networks ▼v Case studies.
650 7 ▼a REFERENCE. ▼2 bisacsh
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Reagle, Joseph Michael. ▼t Good faith collaboration. ▼d Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c2010 ▼z 9780262014472 ▼w (DLC) 2009052779 ▼w (OCoLC)496282188
830 0 ▼a History and foundations of information science.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=324684
938 ▼a Coutts Information Services ▼b COUT ▼n 16838654
938 ▼a ebrary ▼b EBRY ▼n ebr10433726
938 ▼a YBP Library Services ▼b YANK ▼n 3553994
990 ▼a 관리자
994 ▼a 92 ▼b K4R